Icatian Skirmishers

set	min	mtgo
-	A$ 0.75	0.0 tix

Spoilers Random card

Name	Icatian Skirmishers
Type	Creature — human soldier
Description	First strike; banding (Any creatures with banding, and up to one without, can attack in a band. Bands are blocked as a group. If any creatures with banding you control are blocking or being blocked by a creature, you divide that creature's combat damSee more
Flavor	Skirmishers engaged raiders before they could reach the towns. Although these units typically suffered huge losses, they never lacked volunteers.
Artist	Heather Hudson
Set	Fallen Empires #14
Wallpaper	download
Image	download

⚠️

About Icatian Skirmishers

Icatian Skirmishers, Creature — human soldier, designed by Heather Hudson first released in Nov, 1994 in the set Fallen Empires. It's currently being selled by the minimum price of A$ 0.75.

The Icatian Skirmishers card could be beneficial in a white-based aggressive deck that focuses on combat and attacking tactics due to the first strike ability and the potential synergy with banding mechanics. However, in the current Magic: The Gathering meta, there are likely better creature cards with more impactful abilities for similar or lower costs, such as Savannah Lions or Elite Inquisitor, making it challenging for Icatian Skirmishers to see significant play in competitive decks.

Rules

10/01/08

Creatures in the same band must all attack the same player or planeswalker.

10/01/08

If a creature with banding attacks, it can team up with any number of other attacking creatures with banding (and up to one nonbanding creature) and attack as a unit called a “band.” The band can be blocked by any creature that could block a single creature in the band. Blocking any creature in a band blocks the entire band. If a creature with banding is blocked, the attacking player chooses how the blockers’ damage is assigned.

YGO >Cards > Icatian Skirmishers

Meta types

Legality between formats

Table of contents

About Icatian Skirmishers

Rules

Where to buy

Group by

Price alert ?

Price trend history

— Comments 0

, Reactions 1